We would like to be able to profile by readership level, so that it is easy to filter out non-academic content which we do not want to acquire.

We have a DDA with ProQuest and an autofeed for ProQuest content in OCLC collection manager. It occured to us that when the credits points of a non-linear book are spent before the 325 days of usage have been reached and the publication is temporarily not available the title remains visible in OCLC discovery as 'purchased'. Ideally the title should be migrated from the 'purchased' to the 'DDA' collection during the time the title is not available, and moved back to the purchased collection as soon as new 'credit points' have been assigned

对于在1U和3U的扩展访问我们想使用中介的过程，但在这里，用户未通知该标题实际上已经购买并因此进行了审核。
We would like to refer to the purchased/owned title before or during the moderating request.

能够在CSV文件中导出图书馆员注释是很好的。它将有助于图书馆员分析评论并与利益相关者沟通，例如，为什么DDA冠军被拒绝了。

We would like the ability to customize our autopurchase hierarchy, because our preference of Access Model does not match the Purchase Hierarchy for Ebook Central

此外，我们需要能够排除选择访问模型，以便从未购买它们。

Currently the message field on a request form for mediated-DDA is optional but many administrators want users to put comments. So I request administrators can select it's optional or mandatory.

为不同的配置文件具有不同设置的选项，例如：通过购买类型，按主题等。

The ability to select lists of titles to be Autopurchased automatically when enabled for DDA.

AKA（“差异化DDA”）

目前我们可以为每个字段施加一种自定义文本。我们需要一种功能来通过每种语言放置文本，以便如果选择任何语言，将显示相应的自定义文本。

用户希望注意到将标题添加到DDA列表中的日期。

**note - original Idea accidentally removed from list. We invite users who originally submitted/commented on this Idea to reach out to assist in restoring details around this Idea.